Article Marketing Robot Review | Article Marketing Robot Money Off!

Hi Matt, so many software apps that are non- web-based seem to be Windows only. I would suggest this is a preferable app than is UAW for precisely the work that you mention – build up fast and furious anchor site backlinks.

However, there is another service that I have not personally used but I heard good things about from one particular source. Its web based, thus matters not if you use a Mac or Windows apps.

http://www.distributeyourarticles.com/

Its monthly fee, although you can pay for a whole year ($200 US). If paying monthly its $40 per month, thus is quite a bit cheaper than UAW. Or for 3 months its $80 US. Well worth checking out, and I may even use it myself in the coming weeks, in tandem with AMR.

Regards
Joseph

Yes Tom, – and that 5k directories grows some every day! Mind you, successful submission rates are far less than the 5k mark. But I’m happy even to get 1.5k submissions.

No doubt Goog were displeased with me when I tried to cut corners like this. And I’ve suffered ever since Nevertheless, I’m now working on reversing this so hopefully its merely a matter of time and focus and it will be “sandbox” no more! I’ll make mention on the blog here when indeed I do see reversal on the “sandbox” for the sites in question.

Aren’t we all, Ben!

Hope you are enjoying the freezing cold of the UK. I’m coming back over shortly – change in plans – around 18th February or something about then. Yooook – oh so colllllddddd!

Off back to the sack for now though.

Jo

AMR – yes Blake, I do use it on occasion, but I’m the guy who although I spend most of my waking life online, hate working with clunky tools that take a lot of messing around with. I much prefer the online tools where there are no captchas to be fiddled around with, no proxies to work with, no messing around to get the thing to work. AMR is ragged and raw, but it is very powerful, hence its become thoroughly popular. If you can cope with the messing around, this is a worthy tool to use indeed! Be careful with it though, its mighty powerful!

Joseph

Hope you are enjoying fiddling with it Shakil. I found it to be a right fiddle-around to get it working well. Its nevertheless, good value for money, there is no doubt about that!

Hi Steve, yes I am currently using one high end account on Backlinks Genie, so obviously I do feel its worth every penny or I’d not be shelling out $137 a month for it

You’re quite right Steve – I got up just after 5 this morning, and went out to get my 3 bottles of wine and cigars as I always do (I’m forever the health addict, you know), and then power-walked my way home to get some top notch exercise in before I slump in the seat for the rest of the day and grow ever-more fat around the mid-riff

As you know, Genie is so easy to set up and use and it can take but minutes to formulate a new campaign. SEnuke – I tried that a number of times and I think I also tried out the “X=rated version” because I thought there would be more to it than merely backlinking (hahahaha!) also but as you say – the learning curve was pretty extreme so I dumped it pronto. And when I’ve outsourced SEnuke stuff previously, its gotten a few of my sites “sandboxed” even when I told my outsourcees to drip it over weeks and not merely dump a ton of fresh links on my nice new domain. Obviously in which case its far safer to use such a tool along with the outsourcing to fire off to secondary domains that then link back to the money site, which I am a big fan of doing regardless, as you may imagine (40 day challenge).

I’ve actually been using quite a few of the Teenie Geenie stuff to smack my BMR posts (those BMR posts that are a couple months old or more – since they have already proven stick-a-bility and are on their own individual blog/website page). Sometimes I’m seeing fast return on investment here, albeit quite a bit of dancing, but really – I’m seeing this as being a much longer term investment where the maturer backlinks will kick in over time. So if there is an early boost, then that of course is a bonus, but its incidental rather than the main aim.

So there you go – this is not something I have discussed at all on my blog up till now so the “secret” is now out, LOL! Must be the wine is making me a big mouth

I tell you what Steve – it would be interesting to see what does happen to those sites you mention you have in SEnukeX. I presume Goog hit them with a penalty, and in which case, are they now no longer penalized? If so, how long did it take before they were rising again in the rankings since they were first hit?

Yes, using tools to whack other web “properties” that link to your main sites is a good way to go since it shields the main site from damage – and these days, its so easy to do damage to the main site in terms of Goog rankings. I’m working on a client’s site that was hit with a penalty – site wide too. It actually did not take long to get back up in search, plus the rankings for other newer kwds rose up really nicely too – something of a surprise, I have to admit, since site-wide penalties can take many weeks or even months to resurrect to any degree. But what I’m now finding is that its sitting doing not a lot and its not achieved any top ten rankings. I’m thinking about smacking my previous links real hard with a ton of bricks to see if that will tease it to move on up.

Hope you had a good rest, and welcome back to the grind!

I really ought to go over all my affiliate recommendation and special offer pages Claudia, thanks for pointing this out to me!

Joseph

Brendon, I tend to find that if I change categories in BMR then I can go for much further than 200 posts and its still effective. I’ve been doing upwards of 350 recently and its been working out just fine. Mind you, its wise to start mixing up the backlink type well before you reach that level of postings.

So AMR is now priced at $70? I best change my sales page then. That is, as you say, a very good price in comparison to the vast majority of other article submission tools! You can set up a captcha ‘decoder’ on your AMR to handle the captchas for you. May seem like a bit of a waste of money, but those captchas are a pain in the butt after a while.

Regards dropping the BMR account – no. I once dropped my account for about 4 months, then took it up again and all my links were still there, and everything remains in the interface if you do drop the account.

Brendan, LOL – you got me all confused there cos I did check the current pricing on it. I put it down to you having a beer too many, so no harm done there

If you’re not using BMR enough, then dump that dude cos its not paying its way. But yeah, your links will remain in place along with your domains etc. so if you do wanna take it up again, you’ll be good to go!

The only time I used AMR on my money site Brendan is in the fairly recent hi end Goog ranking project (I have used it previously on my sites, but not to good effect I must add). But I would not usually use it on a money site other than one which already has a mass of backlinks in place. A while ago I used it on a client’s site to very good effect, but the clients site already had over 80k backlinks in place so it was reasonably safe to use AMR to boost up the rankings.

Never used Article Demon, Brendan, sorry.

LOL Brendan – no, they are all paying out the same amount Thanks in advance!

Ohhh – I’m happy to try to answer questions about BMR, Brendan, but AMR? I can hardly work the thing, let alone answer questions about it. Good luck with it!

Hi Harrison, yes, you can use AMR – simply drip feed your submissions. The only issue with doing that is – although AMR already has a lot of article directories in their “system”, most of the submissions made will not be successful. Thus to control daily submission rates is not easy. Example – you may do a submission run of 500 articles, only to find that 10 have been successful. Then the next day you do another 500 submissions, and find that this time you get 40 successful. Thus the level of control is not so great – not nearly as great as BMR. But its fine for linking to outer tier sites which link to the money site.

With fiverr gigs where AMR is concerned, if you are pointing your submissions to outer tier sites that lead back to your money site, then that’s okay since I think all fiverr gigs that offer AMR simply do one mass submission with no drip feed possible.

UAW is still a solid performer Harrison. I know there’s been a lot of doom sayers where UAW is concerned, but it keeps doing its thing regardless. There’s another article directory submitter which I’ve yet to use but I’m hearing good things about too – SubmitYourArticles. There are two accounts you can sign up for with this service – $47 a month and $67 a month. I’ve mentioned this service under the Tools of the Trade tab at the top of my header graphic here on the blog, and I’m offering some money back on it like I do with UAW. Heard good things about this service so in due course I’ll be using it myself just to see how things go.

Hi Harrison, keep in mind that they submit to ezinearticles.com Thus any article that they receive from you will have to be up to the standards that ezinearticles.com accept, which these days is a fairly tall order. Normally when we use content to submit to various article directories manually, we’d submit to ezinearticles first since they don’t accept non-unique content. But I would think if the article is well spun, it should be just fine. I’m not totally sure about the SubmtYourArticle stance on this however since I’ve still to test out the system myself. Give it a shot Harrison whilst you still are on the freebie trial and see how you get on. Let me know, please – thanks!

That is too bad Harrison. You could try something like Backlink Banzai. I’ve used them for a while and its a good service. You only need to pop in your URL’s and your keyword choices (up to 20) and you are good to go! What’s more, you can change your URL’s and your kwds as often as you wish – there’s no limit. Check it out at http://www.backlinkbanzai.com

In fact Steve, I pointed all my links at my money sites over a period of a month that I was using the tool. But what I did was to swap around the URLs for each site fairly regularly – so let’s say a couple of days focused on the home page and a couple of inner pages on one site, then I’ll swap that over to different pages, then I’ll go back to the original pages and change the keyword phrases over.

After about a week of doing that, I’ll take the site out altogether and put in a different site and do the same sort of thing. I know that most folks tell you to keep your backlinks regular because it looks unnatural to Google, but I’m doing things differently now. I sense that “jumping about” and not being regular with my backlinks is perfectly natural.

Yeah, watch it Steve – the Goog spies are all around us!

Sounds good – sitting enjoying your coffee whilst watching the birds

I s’pose if the niche is low end then your backlinking will be less “harsh”. So that’s a safer way to progress these days – low hanging “niches”. Recently I set up a site in a very “low hanging” niche and I got a keyword rich domain name. Lo and behold, and the site is now ranking top 5 or so for all variations on the keyword phrases I wanted to target – about 10 in all. How many backlinks? Probably about 10 thus far. These keywords get zilch search in Goog according to Goog, but that’s not the case since I’ve been there before with another website and although traffic is low, conversion is decent (its a CPA offer which pays out 40 bucks a shot, so don’t need many conversions to be making a tidy sum).

Yes, I agree – erratic backlinking makes good sense. Particularly so in smaller niches where some days it would be perfectly normal not to have anyone link to your site, where other days you may get 4 or 5 people linking – bookmarking or Stumbles or whatever.

Wish you well Harrison!

Harrison, unfortunately its the same old same old here – they refuse to provide reports as to where your backlinks are placed because they want to keep their networks private.

Does that make this system a high PR network similar to BMR? Somehow I doubt that. The guys who set this up are incredibly particular about how their system is run – try joining their affiliate program and you’ll see exactly what I mean. Mind you, I’m just going on gut instinct – I can’t be too sure exactly how they are gaining backlinks because they don’t tell you.

What it comes down to is – what type of backlinks are safe these days? Which backlinks offer the most bang for their buck and which type of backlinks will “probably” last the longest.

I’m afraid there are lots of unanswered questions here, but that’s the nature of the SEO game.

Harrison, no I haven’t. Looked into doing that, but I got the impression it was going to be a lot of work. Worth trying to figure out though, I would imagine, since the link would be awesomely valuable where Goog are concerned!

Hi Michael, I did find that occasionally when using AMR that some of the time the bio box is stripped out of your submission by the article directory owner. In other words, its blatant copyright abuse.

I suspect you are right about this – UAW submissions on the whole will be a little higher quality. I think with AMR its much more a case of quantity over quality, but UAW its different.